|
Explaining the workings of FLEET according to Lawrence Tseung
The Tseung hypothesis on the workings of FLEET and some background is as follows:
Part A
1. Any pulse-vibrating object can theoretically impart some of its energy to the surrounding. A tuning fork is a simple example in case of sound.
2. The pulsing frequency can be compared to pushing a swing. Any pushing frequency can move the swing higher. But the swing will go really high only when pushed at its natural or resonance frequency.
3. When a second identical tuning fork is placed in proximity, the pushing of air molecules by the first tuning fork will cause the second tuning fork into sympathetic vibration. The resulting sound will be louder and last longer. We can demonstrate this much better with additional tuning forks (2, 3, 4…20).
4. The logical question is – where does the extra energy come from?
5. The Tseung hypothesis is that the extra energy comes from the kinetic energy of the air molecules. The term lead-out or bring-in energy is used.
Part B
1. Air exists on Earth because of the gravitational pull of the Earth. The molecular velocities of the air molecules are less than the escape velocity. Thus they remain on the surface of the Earth. The gravitational pull on the Moon is much lower and thus all gases escape. (If you are not familiar with escape velocity, use google to search for an explanation.)
2. If we can use the kinetic energy of the gas molecules to produce a louder sound (or to do work), we should be able to use the gravitational energy of the Earth directly.
Part C
1. In December 2004, Mr. Lee Cheung Kin stared at his swinging pendulum toy with a photo of 12 horses. It dawned on him that the pulsing pendulum might be able to lead-out or bring-in gravitational energy. He woke up Mr. Lawrence Tseung to share the discovery. Mr. Tseung did the mathematics.
2. In Physics, a horizontal force cannot do vertical work as Work = Force x Displacement (vector multiplication).
3. In order for a horizontal force to do vertical work, some kind of simple machine such as a pulley is required. In the case of a simple pendulum, no such simple machine is obvious.
4. The other possible explanation is that the tension of the string provides the vertical force. This vertical force and the resulting energy is NOT provided by the horizontal force. The resulting vertical work is in fact the gravitational energy brought-into the system. So long as there is tension in the string, gravitational energy can be lead-out or brought-in!
5. The mathematical calculation showed that two parts of horizontal energy can lead-out or bring-in one part of vertical (gravitational) energy. This provides a Coefficient of Performance COP of 1.5!
6. A quick check on the Internet showed that there is a two stage Milkovic pendulum that claimed COP > 1. According to the Lee-Tseung Lead-out Energy theory, this is entirely possible. The Law of Conservation of Energy has NOT been violated.
Part D
1. The next logical question is – if gravitational energy can be lead-out, can magnetic energy be lead-out or brought-in?
2. The answer is the simple magnetic pendulum experiment done by Ms. Forever Yuen in 2006. Initially many forum members at overunity.com claimed that they did the experiment and the resulting oscillation period never changed.
3. Ms. Yuen replaced the pendulum bob with a small bar magnet. She then placed another magnet below to either attract or repel it. The period of oscillation was again measured. She proved that all the posts by the forum members were wrong. The period of oscillation changed.
4. Leading-out magnetic energy is even easier than leading-out gravitational energy. The magnitude and the direction can be changed. The magnetic field can even be switched on or off.
5. The smallest magnet or dipole is an electron orbiting around a nucleus. There are trillions of atoms in any object surrounding us. If we can lead-out or bring-in such electron motion energy, we have virtually inexhaustible energy.
Part E
1. The next question is – can we replace the pulse-push oscillation by a pulsed rotation?
2. On the Internet, there are many such claimed inventions. Examples are Newman, Bedini, Adams, Liang, Wang, etc. Initially, we thought that we could just work with one or more of these inventors and use their prototypes as conclusive evidence. That turned out to be much more difficult than we thought. We decided to build our own prototype.
3. With the help of Mr. Tong Po Chi, we built a 1 meter diameter Tong Wheel with 16 magnets in the rotor and 15 coils on the stator. A proximity switch was used to control the pulsing time and duration.
4. The coils can be turned on or off. They can be configured as Drive Coils or Collector Coils. The tuning can be done by varying the Coil ratio and the positioning of the proximity switch.
5. We used rms values to measure the Voltage and Current. The result showed that COP was greater than 1.
6. We demonstrated that openly at the Inno Tech Design Expo 2009 in Hong Kong and some professors raised the objection that the rms values could not truly represent the Input or Output Power as the waveforms seen on an oscilloscope were complex. (Definitely not DC or sinusoidal AC).
7. The Tong Wheel, however, was rated as an interesting invention worthy of additional research.
Part F
1. An American Researcher, Rasa, working with a Chinese Group came to visit. He initially placed an order for three Tong Wheels. He casually asked whether the units can be reduced in size so that he could bring them back in his brief case.
2. That triggered Mr. Tseung to work on Pulse only systems with no moving parts. The full development history was recorded in overunity.com under the Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnet thread. Unfortunately, that forum was not moderated. The naysayers, insulters etc made meaningful discussion or presentation impossible.
3. Mr. Conroy Cheng from the third richest family in Hong Kong gave HK$50,000 with no strings attached to do the two oscilloscope demonstration to see if COP could indeed be greater than 1.
4. Mr. Tseung and team succeeded on July 13, 2010 using the Joule Thief circuit as the pulsing source and feedback mechanism. They could show the Instantaneous Input Power Curve on one oscilloscope and the Instantaneous Output Power Curve on another oscilloscope. The waveforms clearly indicated COP > 1. However, Mr. Tseung and Team could not get the mean or the integrate functions to work (not even aware of the mean function).
5. Two workshops were conducted at Hong Kong University. In the second workshop a student, Felix, produced a FLEET prototype with Tseung FLEET Comparison Index of greater than 280.
Part G
1. On October 26, 2010, Mr. Tseung came to USA to visit and spend time with his daughter in Irvine. He brought 8 working FLEET prototypes with him. One teaching demonstration prototype has Tseung FLEET Comparison Index > 200.
2. A retired Professor in Physics (PhysicsProf in this forum) was willing to test the prototype. He lived 70 miles from his University and had to drive in the snow and icy roads to access the good oscilloscopes.
3. The preliminary work was encouraging. He could build high performance FLEET prototypes with a colleague with their own parts.
4. The explanation by Mr. Tseung is that – FLEET is a pseudo resonance device. The particular prototype under test happens to use a one-inch toroid with 13 turns wound with the Joule Thief technique and a 2N2222 transistor. This basic Joule Thief circuit will try to resonate at a certain frequency. These arrangements could lead-out or bring-in the electron motion energy of the orbiting electron in the surrounding environment.
5. The secondary transformer type winding extracts the lead-out or bring-in energy to do work – lighting LEDs and heating up resistors in a pulsing fashion.
6. With a pulsing load, the Joule Thief Circuit could go back to the original near resonance frequency.
7. Thus a continuous process of leading-out or bringing-in of electron motion energy can be maintained. Since it is a pseudo resonance set up, slight changes in physical configuration could affect the resulting Output Power value and waveform significantly.
8. More research need to be done to turn this into a commercially viable product.
|
Author
Topic: Lead-out/Bring-in Energy - Flux Change Systems (Read 33172 times)
