|
Yeah, I remember the "Project" to make a transistor, although we did it with a little better than rocks.
We ARE talking the olden days, when such was not unheard of. Who remembers whisker transistors, etc.?
These modern people, without the experience in original "You had to make it yourself" requirements
might find this hard to believe, but seeing and having to test and hand in a stupid report on the
results can make a believer out of many. Too bad that tech has gone so far that the original basics
are lost to the modern graduate. Just like computers. How many could program an original PDP8
in binary from the front panel switches, depositing one word at a time? THAT was programming.
Of course, this type of stuff seems useless today, but I wouldn't disregard some of the insight or
experience that can be obtained. Unfortunately, it makes it harder to find "Free" energy, cause
you see things a little different.
For a stupid example, take the "Old" Bedini SSG. I HAVE seen a modified design, without the
wheel, using a permanent magnet as a bias and allowed to free run. This setup WILL put out
a little (VERY LITTLE) more power than what goes in. Many would say, WOW, Free energy.
(Many state the true operation is impossible as well, but decide for yourself...) The real trick
that I found in this case was, the magnet was being de-magnitized. The unit would slowly
run down and then you had a very weakened magnet. I didn't go through the math, but I
would be willing to bet that if you added up the Power used to create the magnet, that it
was not very efficient energy storage, but without noticing that little detail...... Several said
that just getting power from a "Permanent" magnet was "Free Energy", but that is not the
case if the magnet doesn't survive. A permanent magnet generator could be made two ways,
in this situation. One: Uses power from the input shaft only. Runs forever, but not "OU".
Two: Phases in a "Tricky" way to pull the "Magnetic Charge" out of the magnets. Very easy
to prove that it puts out "Free Energy", as long as you "Forget" to notice that it dies when
the magnets die. And, of course, many have sworn that you "CAN'T" get power from a
magnet, even if demagnitizing it. I have a different theory, but as I have not gone through
the "Entire" process of detailing the entire thing, I CAN"T PROVE either way, so theory it
remains. (I have done the kill a magnet routine, but not with enough detail for proof.)
All of the above rambling ignore the "possibility" of drawing power from "Other" sources, but
that is another story, anyway. I just had to "Butt In" on the "Breaking Rocks" "Joke".
Just a stupid take on "Charging" batteries. Most educated will laugh, but here it is. IF you
could accept that it "Might" be possible to create, oh say HHO, by using a specific method
that could break down the water in a "Different" way than standard Faraday methods, and
further suppose this method WAS more efficient, then it is the SAME concept that could
be used to alter the "Chemical" state of the battery's charge, without going through the
"Brute Force" method of shoving "Electrons" through it. Wild and Crazy, ignorant of me
to even say, and Yet, The possibility MUST exist, as there ARE proven ways to do just
such a thing with water. (No, I am not privy to such methods, nor do I even have a clue
as to where to begin, but some here certainly do....)
Again, just some thoughts about the reality of the situation, from long experience. No
need to prove me wrong, as what I believe possible matters not to the wise.
I begin to wonder what I am doing here. I never seem to offer useful information.
|
Author
Topic: Bedini 10-Coil Alternative Discussion (Read 71819 times)
