As some may know I have devised a method for ECAT type LENR testing. I have evaluated the protocol using hardware and software outlined in other LENR threads with some preliminary graphic test results, some of which start here:
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2741.msg44296#msg44296If you have no access to the private threads here at OUR,
ask the administrator for access if you have interest in the subject and developed methods.
Below are a few open posts I made at OU.com briefly describing the test setup:
http://www.overunity.com/15567/andrea-rossi-vindicated-cold-fusion-takes-another-step-towards-credibility/msg440599/#msg440599http://www.overunity.com/15567/andrea-rossi-vindicated-cold-fusion-takes-another-step-towards-credibility/msg440609/#msg440609http://www.overunity.com/15567/andrea-rossi-vindicated-cold-fusion-takes-another-step-towards-credibility/msg440614/#msg440614I have long been a believer in the value of differential test methods, and on my bench you will find information of prior differential testing devices built for specific analysis of e.g. small electronic circuits. This method is as old and precise as the balance weighing scale.
The protocol uses a branch of calorimetry known as "Differential Scanning Calorimetry", specifically "Differential Thermal Analysis".
Here is what one person (MarkE) said about the test method I employed:
This technique while not perfect, is massively more objective and reliable than anything we have seen from either Rossi or his sycophant supporters over these past four years. This method measures the temperature using reliable thermocouples, and has a pretty good control in the form of the coupled master / slave heaters first run together both with dummy loads and then side by side one still with a dummy load and the other with the LA|H test load. Anyone who has considered handing cash over to Rossi should be paying Vortex1 for his valuable services.
and
So far this looks like very good work and makes all the nonsense from: Rossi, Levy et-al, and Parkhomov sad jokes by comparison. Your attention to setting up a consistent and reliable basis of comparison between a null control and the unit under test is what everyone who wishes to perform a meaningful experiment should do, but sadly many do not.
From Verpies:
Very well ION, I would do it the same way.
From PhysicsProf:
WOW! very impressive, ION.
With those supportive comments, I might add that I will be available to consult with others, both within and outside of this setting. PM me here.
Also if I have forgotten or otherwise not included supportive statements from anyone, PM me and I will include them here.
Briefly, with this method, the temperature profile of a "Sample" is compared to a "Reference" and any departure from the reference profile is recorded in a real time chart recorder display of time and temperature. Separate matched furnaces are used to heat the sample and reference material.
To get up the learning curve on DSC and DTA, I highly recommend this book:
https://books.google.com/books?id=tRt-Z5Duz7QC&pg=PA13&lpg=PA13&dq=dual+sample+differential+scanning+calorimeter&source=bl&ots=7D0RsTDeGY&sig=ytxak4siViErwEv8HPfH7n8Yg8k&hl=en&sa=X&ei=CIQJVcGMPMeWgwSi1YKwCA&ved=0CEoQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=dual%20sample%20differential%20scanning%20calorimeter&f=false.
There are also many other good books available on the subject matter. I might note that these methods have been highly developed over many decades and they are mature test methods.
Why did I do this? After reading the Lugano report, I was amazed at how such a simple proof of concept could be so obfuscated by a group that claim to use scientific method. From my background in test, measurement, and control of heated systems, it was easy for me to spot the many flaws in the report and the test method employed. I have critiqued the Lugano report and will present that in a separate chapter. There are also inconsistencies in the latest report from Parkhomov, and many questions arise concerning the validity of the report.
Later in this thread I will go over some of the many methods one may utilize to derive quantitative as well as qualitative results in LENR testing specific to ECAT type devices. I will also describe the apparatus I developed specifically for ECAT high temperature analysis using a dual furnace, dual sensing and control approach.
I might add that Defkalion was using DTA to test Rossi's ECAT as early as January 2012 according to NyTeknik.
http://energycatalyzer3.com/news/further-lenr-tests-at-defkalion-and-leonardo-corpAttached are some images of DSC and DTA from the web. Stay tuned for more.
Regards, ION
PS. This thread will be locked until fully developed, but interested comments may post to:
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2884.msg47289;topicseen#msg47289
"Secrecy, secret societies and secret groups have always been repugnant to a free and open society"......John F Kennedy